Canon EOS 2000D Kit 18-55 mm

Advantages: Among the advantages - the price and the mass of "built-in" scene settings for a beginner photographer, which really work.

Disadvantages: If you carefully study the characteristics of the device when buying, then there are no drawbacks. If you want more, pay more for another model.

Comment: So, if you don't get distracted by arguments - "why is it needed at all if I have 100500 megapixels in my phone and generally it takes better pictures", then the device is worth its money. For 20k rubles, professional cameras simply do not exist, so the manufacturer positions it as an entry-level camera. However, the ability to use a wide range of Canon optics will take the owner to a slightly different level of photography. Unfortunately, worthy glass will cost several times more than this carcass, but they will also work. Photography, as everyone knows, was a very expensive hobby at all times. Want a professional camera - pay. But not everyone is ready to pay 100-200k for a fotik which will be filmed "purely for themselves." These are professional cameras for making money.And without specific knowledge, even with such a technique, the majority will not take a picture that is very different from that of an advanced smartphone. This is the lot of the pros. But for a novice photographer, the 2000D is even nothing, an honest camera. Enough to understand - is it worth continuing to improve your skills and spending money on very expensive photo accessories, or is it worth stopping at this. And most importantly, the quality of the photo mainly depends not on the toughness of the camera, but on the skills of the photographer. By the way - about mirrorless cameras - it is very controversially written here. And the cheapest of them is almost 2 times more expensive with similar characteristics.

Advantages: The device itself is very convenient. Pleases the quality of the photos. In skillful hands, it gives ample opportunities for creativity.

Disadvantages: The modest capabilities of a kit lens. Better than nothing, of course, but still more suitable for testing and learning. Therefore, if you want more, get ready to spend money on additional optics. No USB cable included.

Comment: This technique is clearly not just to reach, point and "take a picture." There are smartphones for this. Like any camera, this camera requires first of all the ability to photograph (or the desire to learn it). Then you can unleash its potential. Otherwise, it will be just an unjustified waste of money.

Advantages: High quality and powerful flash. The number of megapixels of the camera. Lens included (not high quality, but at least some). Wide customization options.

Disadvantages: No auto focus. There is no way to record video at 1080p 60fps. Often the pictures are blurry (possibly crooked hands). With a high magnification of the photo, not a high amount of the image is visible, even at this resolution.

Comment: You have to choose between low resolution and high frame rates when recording video.

Advantages: This is a DSLR. for only $ 450. with interchangeable lenses, a diopter adjustment (although it didn't help me) and an optical stabilizer. Quite decent materials. Nice to hold. Puts gps tags on the photo (this is cool)

Disadvantages: I expected this camera to shoot better than the $ 250 mobile phone. But my xiaomi mi max3 shoots not really that worse, and sometimes even better than this camera. The question then - why is she. Control menu - uh. don't even poke your nose without half a liter. nothing is clear, everything is illogical. it is not clear what and where to look. or take a photo in green mode, or take a photo in green mode without flash - that's it. In terms of image quality, again. well, seriously - I expected that she would still shoot better than a far from top smart.

Comment: An adequate state employee. If you want a DSLR, take it. But in the modern world, I'm not sure if this is an adequate purchase. There are mirrorless cameras - they shoot better. Weigh less. The dimensions are much more modest. They cost a little more. There is actually no sense in the DSLR. Designed for those who still live in the early 2000s. For household needs, the use of the camera is unclear - it is oversized. It's heavy. You will pull it out for now, while you aim bye-bye-bye - take the smart one and shoot it. the photo will be even better, especially with post-processing and xdr. The niche of this camera is generally unclear to me. He takes everyday pictures like a telephone. To arrange any photo sessions for them is not prof. camera. Will be the same as a phone. You can't get it out of your pocket quickly. They can't do selfies. like a household camera - it is completely inconvenient.As an “artist's” tool, it falls short. Why is he then? And yes - a separate topic with Wi-Fi pairing. I have not seen a more ugly application for android. brake buggy constantly crashes and hangs. In this case, the process of pairing itself is a separate hemorrhoid. In general, if you REALLY want a DSLR. It is a DSLR. and a budget of up to 500 bucks. then the choice is not very large - as an option, it is quite suitable.