HAMA Star-700 EF Digital (04133)

Short review
HAMA Star-700 EF Digital (04133)
Selected in the rating
7
Best rating tripods
For video cameras - For cameras - Tripods
Back to rating
Share

Buy HAMA Star-700 EF Digital (04133)

Specifications HAMA Star-700 EF Digital (04133)

Yandex.Market data
Main characteristics
Tripod type outdoor tripod
Appointment for photo and video cameras
Shooting height up to 125 cm
Length (folded) 42.5 cm
Head included
Weight 0.62 kg
Functions
Shooting in vertical format there is
Number of boom sections 3
Support ends rubber
Case included there is

HAMA Star-700 EF Digital (04133) reviews

Yandex.Market data
Rating: 4 out of 5
Dmitry M.
Advantages: Lightweight, comfortable, with a case
Disadvantages: I think after a month of work in streaming mode (300 - 400 shots at different angles per day) the clamps will come loose. But this is inevitable.
Comment: It was not the model itself that shocked my imagination, but the method of its delivery. When an employee of the point of issue brought a box according to my receipt, in which the computer system unit could fit. I thought there was some mistake. The box was opened. It was filled with cut corrugated board! Apparently, several of these boxes were passed through some cunning shredder. And only in the depths, under the piles of these fantastically beautiful cardboard noodles, we managed to find a small pencil case with a tripod. My cats are very grateful to the supplier for such a wonderful and cozy nest!
February 27, 2017, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: inexpensive, very lightweight, adjustable tripod height (42.5 to 125 cm)
Disadvantages: the structure looks unstable, although in reality it can support the weight of DSLRs
Comment: For a more than modest price - ideal. I have a canon 60d camera + an EF-S 18-135 mm lens - all together 1.3 kg.
October 18, 2013, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: Small, convenient, handbag included.
Disadvantages: There is no hook for weights. The legs still have a little flexibility under load. There is a water level for the tilt angle, but no level for the entire tripod position.
Comment: I took it for a flash camcorder weighing 300g to shoot home video. This tripod is only suitable for home use, because it is too light. For a camera, I would not recommend taking it, especially for a DSLR (they are usually heavy).
April 3, 2010
Rating: 5 out of 5
Igor Sh.
Advantages: Lightweight, compact, the included bag can be easily attached to the rukzaku (therefore easy to carry), built-in level.
Disadvantages: In appearance, the structure is rather fragile, if they deviate from the end loads on the nodes, they will bend, the screws are rather weak (I am afraid to break them when tightening). Maybe in the process of using others will come to light.
Comment: A good choice for the price ... Well suited for lightweight digital (and film) soap dishes, small camcorders, and entry-level (pop for housewives) DSLRs. For heavier ones (over 500 g), something more serious will be required. In general, I am happy with the choice.
September 16, 2011
Rating: 5 out of 5
Andrey F.
Advantages: Price, convenience for shooting
Disadvantages: Didn't find
Comment: I ordered a tripod for only 750 rubles. Everything is completely satisfied. I was just looking for an option for studio shooting. Feel free to purchase.)
6 February 2019, Moscow
Rating: 4 out of 5
Alexander Chizhikov
Advantages: Price, grabbed this tripod for 719 rubles.
Disadvantages: Very lightweight, flimsy.
Comment: I shoot from my phone, so it's the best for the phone, the price pleased me, unless, of course, I advise against a camera or a camera.
January 26, 2019, Sochi
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: -price -functional -possibility to use with not the lightest camera or camera -adjustment of height up to 1.25m, hinges allowing to shoot from different angles, the ability to rotate the camera in a circle without mixing the tripod
Disadvantages: - the clips of the retractable legs (which adjust the height of the hinge) seemed flimsy to me, it is not known how long they will last if you constantly stick out the legs, if you use the tripod in one place, I think there will be no problems
Comment: - in general, a tripod is not bad for its money for home amateur shooting with not very heavy sophisticated equipment, it will do, for the pros, of course, you need something more expensive and advanced
October 1, 2018, Oryol
Rating: 4 out of 5
Irina Shcherbakova
Advantages: In general, comfortable, good height, there is a hook for a load or bag.
Disadvantages: The big minus is in attaching the camera to the tripod. I found it uncomfortable. And the platform on which the camera is mounted does not inspire complete confidence. Flimsy.
Comment: It is still unknown how the plastic platform and the handle for lifting the camera will behave in winter.
April 8, 2019, Fryazino
Rating: 5 out of 5
S
Advantages: I bought it for a projector. It performs its function. Good height range. Cats have not been able to dump him yet :)
Disadvantages: For 600 rubles (or how much I took it there), you don't need to rely on servos :) Of course there are backlashes, the accuracy of horizontal adjustment - in the "you have to sweat" mode.
Comment: Suitable for my needs. Milking professionals - definitely not.
December 30, 2018, Podolsk
Rating: 5 out of 5
Alena K.
Advantages: Good height! It is convenient that there is a carrying case. Everything is whole, everything functions as in the description.
Disadvantages: Lightweight, easily knocked off the spot by hitting, accidentally, with your foot, But this is not a global problem, for pros and avid amateurs I recommend taking heavier ones)
Comment:
January 13, 2019, Yekaterinburg

Electronics

Office

Appliances