Aquaphor DWM 101S
Short review
Selected in the rating
7
Best rating
reverse osmosis filters
Mineralization - Storage tank - Chlorine removal - Softening
Buy Aquaphor DWM 101S
Characteristics Aquaphor DWM 101S
Yandex.Market data
Main characteristics | |
Device type | filter |
Filter type | system "under the sink" |
Functions | free chlorine removal, mineralization, deferrization, reverse osmosis, softening |
Water connection | there is |
Cleaning methods | coal cleaning |
Using | for cold water |
physical characteristics | |
Filter module included | there is |
Pressure boosting pump | no |
Separate tap | there is |
Storage capacity | there is |
Maximum productivity | 0.13 l / min |
Inlet water temperature | 5 - 38 ° C |
Inlet pressure | 2 - 6.50 atm. |
Porosity | 5 μm |
Dimensions (WxHxD) | 37.1x42x19 cm |
Weight | 6.2 kg |
Additional Information | |
Filter module replacement calendar | no |
Features: | upper membrane drain |
Reviews Aquaphor DWM 101S
Yandex.Market data
Advantages:
Compactness. The cost of water per liter. Cleaning speed. Works very quietly.
Disadvantages:
The water is not tasty, the mini-cleaner does not help in any way (but we knew what we were doing). Inconvenient filter replacement scheme 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years. You need to remember all this. And it would also be nice to make the flasks transparent in order to understand the degree of pollution of the filters and change them on the fact of pollution and not on schedule, but business is business, even you have a distillation in your pipeline, please be so kind as every 6 months. change filters. UPD: After a month of operation, we noticed that when the tank was completely drained, the valve began to buzz quite loudly. Changed the grade from 5 to 4 because of this.
Comment:
For a long time I chose between different options, I even started a tablet in the Excel on the topic of what filter looks like in terms of installation and the prospect of spending in 3 years (see below). In general, we decided to take the most compact and with less pressure requirements in the system. place, etc. There was a fear that the tank would not be enough, and we even left the pitcher filter as a safety net, but after a week of downtime it was removed as unnecessary. In general, the device is suitable, despite the fact that the water has become almost tasteless, but in any case it is better than it was with a jug.
11 January 2018, Moscow
I am using the second week. So far, I like everything very much. Compact, automatic, simple. For home use, the very thing. Let's see how long it will live.
December 21, 2017
Advantages:
the whole filter is one continuous advantage
Disadvantages:
they are not
Comment:
I have long wanted to buy this filter, finally it happened! I had to tinker a bit with the installation, but the result is pure delicious water. This is especially noticeable when you drink tea with this water. In general, I have been familiar with reverse osmosis from the enterprise - there it was used on an industrial scale for water treatment. The thing is worthwhile, I definitely advise everyone!
September 19, 2019, Cherepovets
Advantages:
Price, quality, reverse osmosis with mineralization, dimensions (compactness)
Disadvantages:
no
Comment:
Great system. I chose for a very long time, tk. the family has a small child.I read a bunch of literature about the harm of reverse osmosis, etc. I came to the conclusion that reverse osmosis is the best solution for our ecology. I agree that there is little benefit from such water, but the main task is not to harm, but here is just an ambush: in our city water, you will not find metals and viruses of hepatitis, E. coli, etc. Now I drink calmly from the tap. Earlier I bought and grunt 5-liter bottles with Fruto-Nanny and thought about what good water we drink with the whole family, but how all the children's water turned out to be filtered by reverse osmosis, only on an industrial scale. Everything was fine so far for 5 liters of baby water I paid 45-50 rubles, but today it is already 70 rubles. (Ripping off) Now with a filter, the cost of 5 liters is a maximum of 10-15 rubles, only you don't have to go anywhere and ask yourself. Initially, I considered ATOL, but the price of 12.15.18 thousand - well, nowhere at all)) And the dimensions of Morion are much more compact, which is also an additional plus.
4 April 2017
Advantages:
Filters water from 167 ppm (Moscow standard) to 32 ppm (bottled water under the SPA brand). We use a mineralization cartridge, otherwise it really turns out to be distilled! It is included in the delivery set and can be installed, or you can put a plug.
Disadvantages:
For a month, no shortcomings were found.
Comment:
To obtain a liter of purified water, only 4 liters are consumed, that is, a five-liter bottle of the purest water costs about 70 kopecks!
8 August 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Can work with a water pressure of 1.9 atm
Comment:
21 March 2017
Advantages:
High degree of water purification. No limescale.
Disadvantages:
More expensive to maintain than non-cartridge model. If the water is turned off, then no more water can be poured from the storage tank because there is no pressure in the system
Comment:
The third month of use - not a hint of plaque. The only thing is that the taste of the water is mediocre. Before that we used a jug, aquaphor trio-hardness. The water in the first two weeks tastes like a spring. Then the taste deteriorates. There is also a constant usual taste of water. Installation is simple. With the help of the video, I installed everything, connected it. If there is a tool, it will not cause difficulty. Although some reviews made me worry that I would have to call a specialist. I think the filter is a good purchase. I immediately took a year's supply of cartridges, the time will come - replace without problems.
October 10, 2019, Kazan
Advantages:
compact, filters - subjectively good.
Disadvantages:
haven't found yet
Comment:
I bought it, assembled it myself - installed it, did not raise any serious questions, the instructions are detailed and understandable. it is very compact, the filter system and the tank are located quite tightly, which is important even under a corner sink. filters - naturally by subjective assessment - good. the plaque on the teapot has ceased to form, the water tastes good. tank capacity - so far enough for everything. from, let's say, doubts - a tap for installation on a water supply. It is a checkpoint, the entrance to it is "your". firstly, a straight-through crane is not always needed. secondly, if it breaks down, with a completely serviceable filter, it’s not necessary to change the filter, because there is nothing to replace it with the second - the water tap itself - it would be more convenient if it was a little longer, the Boshevsky kettle hardly fits under it.
March 29, 2018, Moscow
Advantages:
The water is very clean, tested by the device. The first month after purchase, no more than 12 ppm is distilled water.After a year of use with the replacement of 2 filters 24-25 ppm - also distilled ... After 2 years with the same filters 27-28 ppm. Filters out everything unnecessary. Tap water without filter 287 ppm (Moscow). Water consumption from the filter is 5-15 liters per day.
Disadvantages:
According to the manufacturer, filters should be changed frequently. According to the measuring instruments, this is not so ....
Comment:
Buy a water quality meter. I have from X ... mi, worth 500 rubles. Shows flawlessly. And you will understand when to change filters. Without a device, according to the instructions, the cost of servicing the filter is 2-4 thousand per year. I will repeat once again without replacing filters within 2 years ppm does not exceed 30 - distillate. Recommend!
April 5, 2019, Moscow
Advantages:
Convenience and simplicity of design
Disadvantages:
The complete faucet gives an oil film on the received water. If the manufacturer does not care about this and he prefers unsubscribing, then nafig him
Comment:
7 March 2018, Moscow