New Water Econic Osmos Stream OD310

Advantages: Reverse osmosis. Without a tank, water does not accumulate anywhere, bacteria do not multiply in it, this healthy fool does not take place. Inline filters - no "fatigue" of plastic over time, as in stationary flasks. Therefore, the design is more reliable and better able to withstand high pressures.

Disadvantages: Crappy bracket, hard to assemble. Inline filters are somewhat more expensive than conventional filters.

Comment: I'm pleased with the purchase. The issue of drinking water availability in the house has been resolved. Before purchasing, measure the water pressure in the system, the working range of the filter is limited both at the top and at the bottom. You may need a pump or a reducer.

Advantages: 1. Relative to systems with a tank, increased fault tolerance (minimum of components). 2. Less spending on consumables (no storage tank). 3. There is a possibility of modernization (adding steps). 4. Less draining of water (due to low pressure membrane). 5. At 3.3 atm, it gives 440 ml / min (I don’t know TDS, but there is no scale and film after boiling water).

Disadvantages: 1. High cost of the membrane (comparable to the price of a new filter). 2. The check valve is jammed (more in the comments).

Comment: I was looking for a modern option. I think I found it. In terms of operating costs, it requires a minimum investment (except for the membrane from this manufacturer). Here's why I'm lowering the grade: I got it, assembled it on site (without a trial run), put it into operation and drew attention to the constant drainage into the drain. I prepared for a conversation with the hotline - I went to the store for a pressure gauge and an adapter, screwed it in, found out the pressure in the system (3.3 in the afternoon, 4 in the night). I found out opinions on the Internet on solving such issues and changed the location of the 4-way valve from the inlet to the membrane to the drain. It works (it means that the 4-way works)! I'm calling the hotline. Connect with a specialist. I explain the diagnosis, I say that the transfer of the valve gave a result. I find out that (with such a connection) the membrane will use up its resource ahead of schedule. Remaining flow restrictor or non-return valve. I take off the stopper and blow into it (hard) and hear a click. The conversation is over. I assembled the circuit according to the instructions, the drain stops after 1-2 minutes (that is, the check valve does not allow clean water to go into the membrane and release the pressure to close the 4-way valve). Why should I, the buyer of a product ready to work out of the box, learn how it works, look for a solution and eliminate the difficulties that arise in the work of a new thing?

Advantages: No storage tank, compactness. Good performance.

Disadvantages: A very nasty mount. Barely holds an empty filter, with a full sag. I was forced to buy brackets in China.

Comment: Immediately, as recommended on the site, I bought a 5 micron polypropylene filter k871. First I fitted it on the screeds, then on the brackets. Extends the life of other cartridges. Half a year of operation 30 ppm by tds meter xiaomi.

Advantages: quality of water purification, small size, enough cartridges

Disadvantages: No

Comment: I chose because of its small size and lack of a storage tank, the water is immediately filtered directly. After the filter, the water is clean, without foreign odors. Installation is simple, everything you need is included in the kit. I haven't found any cons yet, I've been using it for a little over a year.

I chose it based on two indicators - cleaning quality and ergonomics. In all respects, this filter won, even at the price it turned out to be acceptable for me, since the membrane service life is 3 years and it is not necessary to frequently change the filters. Beneficial, convenient and healthy. The kit also includes a fairly detailed instruction.

Advantages: Price. Cleaning quality. Assembly.

Disadvantages: Performance is poor.

Comment: The filter cleans water perfectly, but rather slowly, the maximum productivity is less than a liter per minute. But this is of course due to the fact that there are many cleaning steps. There are no problems with it in terms of maintenance, it understands, assembles, connects, everything is quite simply implemented and done without unnecessary effort. In general, I'm happy with it, a good model for my money.

Advantages: Good reverse osmosis filter

Comment: The price tag is not the cheapest, but there are no complaints about the quality of the filtered water. The smell disappeared, the scale disappeared, and the water tasted good. The filter is hidden under the sink, easy to install. During filtering, the device does not make noise, changing modules is not difficult. The filter has good performance. So far we are happy with everything.

Advantages: Filtered water quality.

Disadvantages: Not seen yet

Comment: We have been using it for 2 years, there were no leaks, we change the cartridges once a year when the water pressure in the tap drops noticeably, they have not changed since last winter. True, the analysis of the water was not done, but the taste of the water is very pleasant. One can feel softening and the fact that there is no taste and smell of chlorine.

Advantages: once-through system, high-quality membrane and cartridges

Disadvantages: Did not reveal

Comment: First of all, I liked that the once-through system, the water does not stagnate. The cartridge and membrane of good quality, have not changed for a year yet, filters normally. And the dimensions are compact, it does not take up much space.

Advantages: System cost. Cleaning quality. Build quality and materials.

Disadvantages: No.

Comment: A normal system at an adequate price, when choosing, they offered more expensive models, but I did not see the point in them, it seems to me that this cleaning is more than enough. It has been serving me for half a year, I haven't noticed any problems, nothing is leaking, it's easy to change the filter.