Brit Premium Adult L
Short reviewBuy Brit Premium Adult L
Characteristics Brit Premium Adult L
Yandex.Market data
General characteristics | |
Feed type | dry |
Premium | there is |
Super premium | no |
Appointment | |
Animal age | adult |
For small dogs | no |
For medium-sized dogs | no |
For large breed dogs | there is |
Features: | |
Holistic | no |
Grain-free | no |
Organic | no |
Milk mixture | no |
Sauce effect | no |
Dietary | no |
For active | no |
For those living at home | no |
For allergies | no |
To remove wool | no |
During pregnancy | no |
In stressful situations | no |
Diseases | |
With joint diseases | no |
With diabetes mellitus | no |
For gastrointestinal diseases | no |
For constipation | no |
For liver diseases | no |
With urolithiasis | no |
For kidney disease | no |
For diseases of teeth and gums | no |
Structure | |
Main ingredient | bird |
Garnish | cereals |
With Chiken | there is |
With salmon | no |
With tuna | no |
With duck | no |
With trout | no |
With a rabbit | no |
With turkey | no |
With lamb | no |
With veal | no |
With pork | no |
With seafood | no |
With moose | no |
With venison | no |
With mackerel | no |
Brit Premium Adult L reviews
Yandex.Market data
Advantages:
I feed a German shepherd. Wool ok, shedding on schedule. No dystrophy or dysplasia. Stool is normal. I conclude that the feed is properly balanced. The dog is 3.5 years old at the moment. I give two handfuls of food per bowl, pour 150 grams of kefir on top. 15kg bag lasts about 1.5 months. I do not feed natural.
Comment:
There is no point in experimenting with other foods. Price / result. Cheaper feed will be bad, more expensive is unnecessary. If this food seems expensive to someone, give the dog into good hands, you will not feed it.
May 7, 2019, Moscow
Advantages:
Normal delivery, quality feed
Disadvantages:
The composition is of course meager, and the price is clearly overpriced.
Comment:
My pet seems to be happy, well, if he feels good, then everything is fine ..... Let's try to take it again.
4 january 2017
Advantages:
Budget option, suitable for all breeds
Disadvantages:
The composition is far from ideal, dry
Comment:
I was looking for quality food at a budget price for my dog. I decided to take a chance, I really liked its composition, price, quality of packaging. I can say I was not mistaken - my dog eats it, there is no allergy, but I want to warn you right away that the food is dry.
November 17, 2016, Moscow
Advantages:
Nice packaging.
Disadvantages:
Strange food smell. A bit not appetizing. Chicken feed. The dog, if there is an alternative, will prefer another.
Comment:
I bought it for the action, I thought why "no"? I have not bought one before. In general - feed as feed.
January 23, 2018, Novosibirsk
Advantages:
Quality
Disadvantages:
No
Comment:
Excellent value for money. I got this food and never regretted it. The dog was satisfied, even two whole))
May 23, 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Good feed quality
Disadvantages:
Price
Comment:
I took these foods for the dog, the line is large, of course, but wildly expensive. I generally keep quiet about canned food
11 August 2016, Shchelkovo
Advantages:
Value for money.
Comment:
April 27, 2020, Moscow
Advantages:
Inexpensive, non-allergenic, the dog eats it normally. Of course not straight, but the dog is happy.
Disadvantages:
Strong unpleasant odor. I don't understand how the dog eats it. :-)
Comment:
Fed the dog for almost 8 months Royal Canin, severe dermatitis began. The dog became almost bald. We changed the feed, started feeding Brit, everything returned to normal. Wool is even better than when fed Royal.
8 March 2018, Voronezh
Advantages:
Cost, feed composition, package size
Disadvantages:
No
Comment:
The dog eats with pleasure. There are no health problems (eyes do not flow, hair does not climb). I feed according to the rate indicated on the package
December 27, 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
quality
Disadvantages:
no
Comment:
Good food, does not cause allergies, that's the only thing I buy.
20 February 2017