Yokohama Parada Spec-X 285/45 R22 114V

Advantages: Excellent driving performance. Quiet enough with directional pattern. Comfortable. Holds well in fast turns and lane changes. Lightweight.

Disadvantages: except for screeching in corners ..)) no others have been identified

Comment: I bought this rubber for FX35 (2) in dimension 275/45/20 instead of the standard bridge 265/60/18. Otezdil full last season, currently installed on cars. Yoka is lighter than similar competitors, therefore, in combination with forged discs, it was possible not to increase the weight of the wheel, but even to reduce it by 1.5 kg! Despite the reduction in the profile, the car has become more comfortable, it passes speed bumps and other irregularities more smoothly. The car became even better and sharper handling, small rolls disappeared during fast cornering and lane changes at high speeds. The only caveat, the rubber squeals in the corners ..)) I rarely go out of town, but once there was a need to cross the field .. The rubber was very pleasantly surprised, despite the fact that the road was after rain and looked like mud ruts! With no off-road gadgets at all, the FX almost belly passed this off-road test with ease (the only thing was SNOW was on) !! Rubber brakes very well and behaves reliably in heavy rain, aquaplaning starts only at very high speeds. On asphalt ruts, the tires behave reliably. Despite the rather high Treadwear (wear resistance) -420, the rubber is tenacious and holds the car perfectly during very active driving! Very pleased with the rubber! His money (bought for 11,000 rubles for a tire) works out by 105%! I am looking closely at 22 "discs, in case of purchase, I will definitely buy this model in the amount of 285/35/22. Recommend!

Advantages: The main thing is the price and quality, I use it on two cars (RR and Tuareg) and here and there R20. On the RR, this is already the second set, the first departed somewhere around 60 thousand km and there was still a margin, but I just did not pull with the replacement, and so I think it would be enough for the season (10-15 thousand km). The rubber is comfortable, not noisy, the directional pattern copes with aquaplaning very well, is not afraid of ruts, handles well, but not sports, but there is no rigidity like the H / P sport or Conti 5 bridge or similar. Plus, it clearly wins in cross-country ability outside the asphalt due to a more developed pattern, it was tested on fishing on sand and grass when the boat was launched.

Comment: I advise rubber, a very good and balanced set of qualities

Advantages: This tire is one big advantage. For her, there is no such thing as a track

Disadvantages: no

Comment: I almost never write reviews, but I read them myself before buying. So I decided to write a review about this purchase, because there is no limit to my joy. I bought an Audi Q5 shod in a Dunlop Sportmaxx GT made in Germany. This is one misunderstanding, not a tire.Maybe they have everything in order on ideal roads in Germany, but our car just jumps out of a rut, all the small joints on the road are felt, you need to hold on to the wheel with both hands and very tightly, in general, I have no pleasure from driving in the first month of operation received, even upset. I decided to change the tires, read reviews and tests, and as a result settled on this model. Oddly enough, this model did not appear in any test from different publications, but at the same time not a single negative review. And now for more than a week I have just been in paradise !!! No joints, ruts or other misunderstandings. I don’t know how this rubber will behave further, but at the moment I am very pleased. Recommend!

Advantages: great model! Installed 275/45/20 on Range Rover Sport. Rubber is soft, ABSOLUTELY silent! Excellent handling on wet and dry asphalt. Nice appearance, great drive and balance without problems. Adequate price for a given size.

Disadvantages: did not reveal

Comment: Recommended for large and powerful city SUVs

Advantages: soft, quiet, price-quality ratio, made in Japan

Disadvantages: in the text

Comment: I bought this rubber to replace the regular bridgestone duel, which did not suit in all respects. The main requirements are noise (that is, noiselessness) and reliable handling in any (summer) weather. What I got: - really low noise level, now at 120-140 the noise of the motor, not rubber, was heard; - holds the road well on dry asphalt, in the rain, on light off-road, and also behaves well on a strong rut; - I also liked that the road became "softer", where the duel kicked the suspension with a blow, the yoko passes with a slight sway; - the car began to coast longer; - in my dimension, the price turned out to be 1-2 thousand per cylinder lower than other well-known brands, while the production is in Japan. What I didn’t like: I bought and installed rubber in one store, and it turned out that one of the balls required 60 grams. load on one side only, in my opinion this is too much for new tires. It's good that I noticed and changed on time. All others demanded no more than 10-20 grams. on the wheel. P.S .: I bought a regular size 225 / 65-17

Advantages: moderately soft, wear-resistant

Disadvantages: hums

Comment: In general, decent tires for this money, I bought 2 years ago 235 60 R 18 for 7000 pieces. If you compare with Dunlop Sp 270, then these are much softer, besides, Danlop wore off 50,000 before the cord, on these they drove 30 thousand of wear is not visible. As for the noise, it is not the rubber that makes noise, but the stones that are hammered into the tread, then fly out from there at speed, but not all, in the end we ride on "stone spikes" that create this hum.

Advantages: - soft - quiet - no aquaplaning, even in very deep puddles - excellent handling on dry / wet asphalt - it also rides very well on mud - cute tread pattern

Disadvantages: not seen yet

Comment: Auto: GX 470. It cost me 60 thousand. I put it on, went and ... was very pleasantly surprised. Even in comparison with the winter hakkapelita (265/65/17) it is very soft and the big 20's slippers are almost not felt. Very quiet, pleasantly rustling on the asphalt. Puddles, even deep ones, pass without aquaplaning, they do not slow down on the water. In corners like on rails, the handling is amazing. Now, if from little things, the tread pattern looks nice, gives some solidity to the jeep)

Advantages: - directional tread, therefore the lack of aquaplaning, even at very deep puddles and high speeds - excellent handling, does not pull into a rut at all - good off-road potential - Quiet

Disadvantages: After driving on a dirt road, you have to pick out small stones from the tread

Comment: I took 225/60/18 and drove about 3k kilometers. The rubber is surprisingly quiet and moderately hard (someone writes about squealing in corners, howling at speed, but I don't have that), it is perfectly controlled in any conditions. I did not notice aquaplaning at all, even driving through a puddle 10 cm deep at a speed of 90, the car goes straight ahead, like on dry asphalt. Rubber has excellent off-road potential, left the cottage after 2 days of rain on the clay, never got stuck, others were just afraid to go.

Advantages: Walkability, does not feel a rut, not very noisy, versatile.

Disadvantages: With severe wear, it becomes noisier, but this is natural.

Comment: I bought a second time, a car x-trail t31. I rolled it on the first set for three seasons in the region of 70 thousand, based on a season of 20 25 thousand km. The tread depth was 4-5 mm to the beacons somewhere mm2, I sold it. I bought the same. The first comp.t was 225 60 18 now I bought 235 55 18. On the 60 profile it was softer 235 looks better, this rubber generally looks narrower than other models, so my 235 visually looks like a regular continental 225- th Impressions of rubber: On the highway goes straight to the track does not react (you calmly rebuild from row to row on other wheels throws you out, but here you hold the steering wheel with one finger) This summer I went with my family to the south, got into a heavy downpour somewhere from Tula to the end of the paysite Voronezh, the whole flow of cars fell to 80-90 km / h, I drove 100-110 farther began to emerge.In Kharabaly, I checked in the mud after a good rain, who had been there knows what kind of roads there are in the steppe, rode confidently on the climbs, too, even on the front drive (dabbled) in deep clay, too, pearl, there was no feeling that I was about to get up, the tread was cleared, on wet grass it was almost like on ice. I see a plus in the fact that the tread pattern remains unchanged with wear, on a regular dunlop after the season half of the pattern disappeared only the longitudinal grooves remained, on the Michelin latitude xn the same thing and naturally increased noise and in the puddles you start to emerge a couple of times the rubber squeals on the floor, the rubber squeals does not break down, only then the ABS works, I drove the X with the regular hp conti too braked to the floor such a feeling as if there was no squeal of tires under the wheels, I had a dozen kama that also braked as if rubber was made of soot.At a speed of 120 and above there is a barely noticeable hum, but it's just noise on smooth asphalt on other surfaces from the wheels, if you compare with other tires, then the noise will be the middle of the Michelin, while the new one is generally quiet, but then Kick-Ass, Korean is much noisier. In general, rubber for a crossover is a universal find, like good sneakers and you can go to a picnic and go to football

Disadvantages: Slightly noisy, no rutting

Comment: I took myself such rubber on a Grand Cherokee jeep in the size of 275 / 55R20, excellent tires in every sense of the word, no rut, soft, no aquaplaning, little noisy, I really liked this rubber for two seasons.