Panasonic MJ-M171

Advantages: Build quality. Small size. Includes blender with glass flask. On-the-fly mesh cleaning brush.

Disadvantages: Created for small tasks.

Comment: From 635 g of peeled medium-quality carrots, 380 g of juice was obtained. Total yield = 60%. From 228 g of grapes (including branches), 189 g of juice was obtained. Total yield = 83%. From 1 kg of apples (Russia) 750 g of juice was obtained. Total yield = 75%. The result is excellent.

Advantages: -Compact, due to its rectangular shape it fits well on the table. - The cake from hard fruits and vegetables is completely dry, with the addition of oranges or lemons it becomes softer. -Like the bundled blender, it does well, for example, milkshakes or mashed soft vegetables or fruits. -Powerful enough, despite the small declared power, the juice is squeezed out quickly and a lot. Ideal for home use (we did not try to squeeze juice on an industrial scale, we live in the Far North, therefore, purchased fruits and vegetables). -Easy to clean, easy to disassemble and assemble. -Perfect value for money.

Disadvantages: -No juice glass: because the spout for the juice outlet is located quite low, with difficulty we picked up a low and wide container for collecting juice (a 2-liter plastic box came up from for ready-made shish kebab or sauerkraut). - There is no place for the cord, when cleaning the juicer in the cabinet, the cord dangles outside.

Comment: Thanks to the forum users for their feedback and help in choosing a good juicer - they played a decisive role in choosing a decent model. I really like the purchase, put it on the table and drink multi-juice (carrots, apples, orange, lemon) every day. I really like the presence of foam in the juice, although many members of the forum noted the absence of a skimmer. With 3 medium carrots, 2 apples, lemon and orange, about 600-700 g of juice is obtained. Oranges and lemons should be peeled, apples should be cut into quarters and cored, carrots should be washed well enough and the ends cut off. It is a pity that the manufacturer did not attach at least a small booklet with recipes for juices and smoothies or cocktails for a blender, and a plate about the content of carbohydrates in freshly squeezed juice would also be useful - I am a diabetic, this is very important for me. Although the glass cup for the blender is heavy, it doesn't bother - the plastic gets scratched and cloudy after a while, but the glass doesn't. The difference between MJ-W171 and MJ-M171 is in the manufacturer: W171 - Japan, M171 - Malaysia. We bought Malaysia - Japan does not reach our village - we are still very satisfied with the purchase.Thank you for your attention, maybe my review will also help someone make the right choice.

Advantages: The price and quality are up to the mark ... easy to wash, no problem, you just need to wash immediately.

Disadvantages: uh uh ...

Comment: I squeeze 2-3 glasses of juice every day, it is great. The cake from pears is generally dry, it looks like dust. From oranges, slightly damp, like plasticine. Better all squeezes juice from solid products. A medium apple and pear together gives 200-250ml of juice! I am very satisfied ... especially compared to the previous Moulinex ... I recommend!

Advantages: Simple, functional, the juice is quite clean and the price is quite affordable.

Disadvantages: The mesh is quickly clogged, but the Japanese fellows foresaw this by adding a window to the design, and a convenient brush in the kit. If you are not lazy and clean in time, then the waste is drier, and there is more juice in the glass.

Comment: I'm not an experienced user, so I'm quite happy with her; on dry land, cake can be obtained, I think, only from under the press.

Advantages: Ease of use. Compact, sleek. Easy and quick to wash. Dry cake. Low price.

Disadvantages: No

Comment: At first I looked at more expensive juicers, but I started reading reviews and was disappointed. I began to choose according to reviews. This became decisive in the purchase. At first I didn't like the design of this juicer, judging by the photo, but in fact it is very compact and cute. Slightly taller than a toaster and lightweight. It is simple and convenient to use. I join all the positive reviews, thanks for helping me make a choice. For a glass of juice, 2 or less (depending on size) apples are enough for me. The entire procedure from cutting an apple to finishing the wash takes less than 10 minutes. I recommend to all.

Advantages: There are a lot of mega advantages: + The cake is generally excellent (like plasticine from apples, carrots, pumpkins, etc. .. from an orange a little wet, but just a little) + again you can squeeze oranges, and not every centrefuge can boast of this + + thoughtful tough a brush that connects to a bottle of water and it is generally a pleasure to wash the mesh, but the NET can be easily washed with an ordinary sponge in 2 minutes. + not CHINA (like all other juicers are stupid), but MALAYSIA (sorry JAPAN has already been discontinued) + completely metal strainer (not a gram of plastic, some kind of special alloy at the bottom of the calico) + does not stink of plastic + low power, Panasonic amazes with its ingenuity (in total 230 W, and other companies need at least 700 W to sting normally) + blender included, well, I really don't use it yet, but in the summer I think I'll also thank him) + the blender bowl is made of glass, not plastic + QUALITY higher prices are unambiguous, everything is strong, not flimsy, it's better not to drop, but it's not scary to DROP + I think it's perfectly THOUGHT, since Panasonic has NO other juicers, which means everything in this one is perfected to a muimeter :) + CONVENIENT to assemble, disassemble + reliable to the touch latches lids + the small size of the juicer itself (for some reason it seemed huge to me on the pictures on the Internet for the first time) + it resembles a Soviet machine with gas water in design (I think because of the buttons), but I like this appearance, and it will look good in any kitchen and will not take much space + rubberized legs + cool buttons, and Toko Panas has such a gadget, all others have switches, ahaha)

Disadvantages: Well, there is truth and a fly in the ointment: - a little noisy (I'm a little afraid of her sales when I turn it on :) - you need to get used to cutting vegetables, fruits, otherwise they will get stuck across the neck - the cake will hit the lid with a crackle (but the QUALITY will not let you down, not being afraid ) - well, the price is not very modest, you can drop a couple of acres (UAH 1122) - there is nowhere to hide the cord, but all this has already begun to nitpick ...

Comment: And also an IMPORTANT MOMENT !!!! On the box everything is written in Russian (I live in Ukraine, Kiev); on the juicer itself, the phrase "MADE IN MALAYSIA" is also written in Russian, and so on. but usually they write in English, well, how should it be Made in Malaysia. I thought everything was a fake, they threw me, but by calling the Panasonic service center I calmed down, they explained to me that the manufacturer adjusts the DESCRIPTION to the region of consumers, and therefore everything was Russified to us (except for the name Panasonic MJ-M171 and some other words there, I don’t remember , they should be in any English.) JUICER SUUUPEEER PuPER)) I chose for a long time and I'm glad! I advise everyone, I painted it in detail as I could, but of course you decide. Good luck with your choice!

Friends, I do not have the habit of sitting in chats, discussing what, wasting time. I just want to help those who are tormented by the choice of a juicer. We have had this model for a long time, the quality of the product obtained is very good, there is little waste and you don’t worry "but here you can squeeze out how much more ..." I noticed that when you come to the store, the sellers do not recommend Panasonic at all (probably, it does not gives them bonus points in the form of gifts for the sold 50 goods Hee-hee!))) The juicer is excellent, they also have a cool meat grinder. I chose a model based on reviews on the Internet. In the store they were selling all sorts of nonsense - expensive and huge Bork, a toy phillips. Once again, you are convinced that the same characteristics are implemented differently in different models. There seems to be nothing special here, but the result is there. Thanks to everyone who left a review here and helped us choose exactly what we need. Thank you!

Advantages: one can almost always speak of the advantages of this device with the prefix "very". squeezes juice very effectively - dry cake. very easily and quickly disassembled, washed and assembled, all this takes 3-4 minutes, and this can be done even with a blindfold. the details seem to be specially made for children - there are few of them, they are simple and safe in shape. The sieve is very strong. very low power consumption. very high-quality plastic, if washed with a sponge and with foam, even without fanaticism, then it is not painted from carrots. The idea of ​​cleaning a sieve on the go is simple and very helpful. makes noise within reason, it can be used even at night, if quickly) very ergonomic shape - fit even in the smallest kitchen.

Disadvantages: no radio, does not read DVD, does not show the temperature and humidity outside the window. does not fit well into the interior of the car. this is of course a joke. on a large scale, you can find fault with everything in the world. as they say, there is not a single object in the world that is ideal from all points of view, especially if you search for a VERY long time)

Comment: its design allows you to drink juice whenever you want, makes the procedure comparable in ease with brewing tea in a bag. you do not have a question - "and who treats us today?", or "who will wash all this?" here they talked a lot about the soviet design, about the irrelevant form and so on. citizens, it's just a miracle and not a design. everything is so thought out, so balanced, logical. this is OLD SCKOOL. I would give a prize to authors for their contribution to everyday culture (my mother is generally for the Nobel Prize). the guys from PANASONIS are not fools - they know what they have done and that the best is the enemy of the good, and this thing will be an example of engineering thought for a long time, such as the AK-47 assault rifle, CONVERSE sneakers, I-pod, Nikon-FM2 ... these are all from the category of eternal values ... these things have already become brands in themselves. sorry for the pun: made for gourmets. the choice is yours. Thanks for attention.

Advantages: Fast! Clean! Cake dry! Very convenient to wash! Great thing - I advise.

Disadvantages: If you expect from the technology exactly what it is intended for, AND NOT MORE, and does not treat it with nagging, then there can be NO shortcomings! You need to find out all the nuances in the store and correctly express your needs!

Comment: And for those who do not smoke, what the first button is for is the less powerful speed, and then twice as powerful, the impulse is used more for the blender. It is convenient to clean the sieve with a brush when you want to produce a large amount of juice at the same time. Or you squeeze juice from citrus fruits, for example, the sieve will quickly clog up - here is the brush and the assistant.

Advantages: After reading many positive reviews, I decided to buy. Liked! Recommend. Easy and quick to clean. Nice juice. Little foam. The blender included is also a pleasure.

Disadvantages: The design is simple. Apples will not crawl whole. Need to cut. If you need to drive more than 4-5 glasses of juice at a time, then it will not work either.

Comment: Just in case: the difference between PANASONIC MJ-171PR and Panasonic MJ-W171PWTQ is that in the first version the blender has a glass cup, and in the second it is a plastic one (as they explained to me).