Inspector Marlin S
Short review
Selected in the rating
17
Best rating
video recorders with radar detector
GPS - Shock sensor (G-sensor) - Recording: cyclic - Recording quality: Full HD - With screen
Buy Inspector Marlin S
Inspector Marlin S Specifications
Yandex.Market data
Main characteristics | |
DVR design | normal, with screen |
Number of cameras | 1 |
Number of video / audio recording channels | 1/1 |
Video recording | 1920×1080 |
Recording mode | cyclical |
Functions | shock sensor (G-sensor), GPS, GLONASS |
Recording | time and date, speed |
Sound | built-in microphone (can be disabled) |
Camera | |
Matrix | 1/3" |
Viewing angle | 130 ° (diagonal) |
Video recording | |
Video duration | 1 min, 3 min, 5 min |
Write protection | there is |
Event recording to a separate file | there is |
Modes | auto start recording, shutdown by timer |
Recording format / video codec | MP4 / H.264 |
Food | |
Food | from the battery, from the vehicle electrical system |
Battery format | own |
Battery life | 20 minutes |
Battery capacity | 520 mAh |
Screen | |
Diagonal | 2.4" |
Resolution | 320×240 |
Data storage | |
Memory card support | microSD (microSDXC) up to 128 GB |
Formatting the memory card | there is |
Additionally | |
CPU | Ambarella A12A20 |
Features: | suction cup, voice prompts, radar detector |
Additional Information | signature radar detector; sensitivity modes - Highway / City / City 1 / City 2 / IQ (Smart Mode) / Signature (Signature Mode) / Signature IQ (Smart Signature Mode); ranges - reception of radars ARROW ST / M, K - 24.150 GHz ± 125 MHz, X - 10.525 GHz ± 50 MHz, Laser - 800 ~ 1000 nm (180 °); signature detection - "CORDON" (incl. "CORDON-M" 2) / "CRETCH" (incl. "SKAT") / "KRIS" / "VOCORD" / "ISKRA" (including "RADIS") / "BINAR" / "ROBOT" / "AMATA" / "LISD"; GPS coordinates database - "STRELKA-ST" stationary radars, stationary control cameras, "Low-power" radars, "Avtodoria" average speed control systems, etc., "Potok" systems, dummy radars and cameras |
Inspector Marlin S reviews
Yandex.Market data
Advantages:
The suction cup has been holding for 3 months and does not fall off. You can turn the parting in any direction. Wide viewing angle. Intuitive menu. Two in one - less wires. The presence of GLONASS.
Disadvantages:
The quality of the shooting is unimportant and the compression of the video is poor, The sound notification is poor, the sensitivity of the radar is weak.
Comment:
I don’t know why this model is being promoted? The device was not particularly pleasing. Let's start with the registrar. Compare with DVR-1GP. The viewing angle of the Marlin S is noticeably larger, but there is also a minus: it is already difficult to discern the license plates of a car going ten to twenty meters in front (even if you zoom in as close as possible, the resolution of the lens does not allow), barrel-shaped aberrations (curvatures at the edges) at the edges are very significant (straight pillars along the edge seem to be round in a third of a circle). 1GP is better with this. Further, if 1GP allowed me to make at least 3 trips with recording on one 32GB card, then on Marlin - 1-1.5 of the same trips at best, even with a bitrate of 12.0 Mbps. In addition, 1GP files were written for 45 minutes. and Marlin only 5! Lots of five-minute files on your flash drive! Archiving trips from a flash drive is very difficult, no disk will be enough! Antiradar. Compare with SHO-ME G-700. Things are no better here. On some radar signals, it responds only 100 meters away. I will see the radar with my eyes ahead. The voice acting is simply disgusting: the most popular message is "object passed." At the same time, what kind of object and when I managed to pass it is not reported. It's just that the object has been passed and nothing else! Apparently, it is assumed that I should not look at the road, but at the Marlin screen, so as not to miss something.The sound itself is bad: for a noisy road, even the maximum volume is insufficient, unlike SHO-ME. Repetitions at low volume are practically inaudible. Marlin often emits some kind of very quiet and indistinct chirping on the radar signal, which you perceive as some kind of car malfunction. Was there really no other sound to pick up? He is generally silent about some radars, and about some he begins to be terribly hysterical, despite the fact that I walk at a much lower speed than the limit. The maps of cameras and other objects are very bad: even in the nearest suburbs, Marlin no longer knows where he is going and does not show anything except speed, even in settlements. He just doesn't know about them!
June 16, 2018, Krasnogorsk
Advantages:
1. Build quality. 2. An understandable and accessible interface. 3. Signature mode works together with the usual one (the radar component is very pleasing). 4. Made in South Korea! 5. Regular update of camera bases. 6. Quality of filming + modern hardware + support for memory cards with a large volume today.
Disadvantages:
1. Large size (but for a combo, in principle, normal). 2. The resolution for such hardware could also be made Super HD (which I hope is not excluded in the future). 3. The length of the power cord (I would like more to hide the wires and they do not dangle in the cabin).
Comment:
January 9, 2018, Stavropol
Advantages:
Excellent assembly Clear menu Operation of the whole complex Price (a little more than 9tr) / quality ratio (after all, Korea) A12 processor Display of all information on the VR picture
Disadvantages:
No Perhaps as a set, it would be nice to have a cover and a wire for hidden wiring
Comment:
Everything is fine, does not blur, does not distract, I ran it with a 800 km race. I heard everything I saw, nothing bothered me, nothing irritated. I caught myself thinking that I have had it for many years.
March 17, 2018, Yekaterinburg
Advantages:
Ease of use. Simple menu, convenient menu navigation. Everything is clear the first time.
Disadvantages:
There is not enough indication of the permitted speed as a guide. The speed limit is displayed only when the camera / radar passes. Considering that the device has a database of road signs, this is not difficult to do. in the city gets it with a creep :)
Comment:
And so the thing is cool.
March 21, 2018, Moscow
Advantages:
simple and convenient. clear menu. simplicity of software and database updates
Disadvantages:
does not announce the camera and speed limit by voice. in the city just displays it on the screen and that's it. very uncomfortable
Comment:
May 29, 2018, Moscow
Advantages:
Three in one. A good average matrix, I think it is enough. Loading maps with cameras. If there is no camera on the card, the radar will fix it. In any case, you will put it, even if you only need a video recorder, you will receive a radar alert). You never know where you will find where you will lose.)
Disadvantages:
I did not find any flaws.
Comment:
A very good solution for your money. I went with this radar detector to the Crimea. There are no fines, you go calmly.
23 August 2018, St. Petersburg