Neoline X-COP 7500S

Advantages: Since 2014 I owned Neoline X-Cop 7500 and changed it to 7500S. The family and friends also had Neoline X-Cop 7500 since 2013, they are also happy with them. The radar detector of the 7500 model should be changed to the 7500S because there were many improvements, improved work with GPS, for example, sometimes the radar detector used to talk about cameras from parallel streets, improved the flexibility of settings, removed a lot of interference, it became much quieter in the city, in more detail I will describe everything in a comment. But if you need it briefly, it works really cool, I recommend it!

Disadvantages: You can only place it on the suction cups, the speaker is on the bottom, do not put it on the panel, although for me personally, suction cups are more convenient. Neolyn does not have the pronunciation of specific radar models, i.e. definitions of radar models not by GPS, but directly by the radar part, which is what some of Neoline's competitors boast about. But in fact, the pronunciation of which the competitors are boasting is self-indulgence, because, as the tests of i2hard.ru have shown, the competitors of neoline call radar models with errors, it reaches as many as 7 errors out of 10 cases, as tests have shown. And the tests of the Zarulem magazine spoke of such a problem. Those. neoline's competitors, we will not name them specifically, they may tell you that in front of you is Krechet, but in fact there will be Oskon. And neoline speaks the cameras from the GPS base, but only the range speaks on the radar part. In other words, a minus, but if you figure it out, then maybe even a plus. By the way, about the price, many people lead this into an argument against neoline, which is usually a little more expensive, but firstly, in my opinion, it is worth paying extra for the best quality, but it’s better and below I’ll tell you why, and secondly, the radar detector cost me 6950 rubles. which is very acceptable.

Comment: There are two fundamentally different approaches to filtering out interference, the first is when a radar detector receiving a signal from a camera verifies it with its radar base and gives an alarm if the signal matches, but in this, called signature mode, radar detectors can sometimes miss radar installations, and this is already bad! But there is another technology, when the radar catches everything, but filters out exactly interference from sensors of dead zones and automatic doors, power lines, etc. This is done in order not to miss the radars, this is the path taken by the Neoline developers. They do not "catch" radars for signatures at all, only jamming is left.Which, in my opinion, should lead to a greater number of false alarms and interference, but it is guaranteed to warn about cameras. In fact, it catches all existing cameras and has practically no interference! There is also a difference between radar detectors in how much in advance, how much earlier competitors are caught by cameras, because the warning about the camera when it is already caught is not very happy. Personally, I made a point in choosing a radar detector in an article on the site i2hard ru when I saw how different in quality the radar detectors are when disassembled! And I realized why in the tests of the magazine Zarulem Neoline caught radars earlier than competitors! Yes, because the filling, so to speak, in terms of hardware is more serious, the incoming horn is polished, the LNA signal amplifier is absent from most competitors, the GPS antenna is larger than that of competitors. As for the base of stationary radars notified by the GPS module, it is worth noting that everyone takes it from the so-called SpeedCam source and the difference, in general, is only in the frequency of updates. But even if the manufacturer updates the database daily, it is unlikely that you will update your device so often, I personally try to install updates every couple of months. In no case do I want to dissuade or persuade you to make this or that choice, make it your own head, I share only my opinion and justify my personal choice.

Advantages: The detection range goes off scale, takes stationary radars beyond 3 km! It catches trines well, a pleasant notification with muffling, a high-quality Korean device.

Disadvantages: He catches so well, but he also messes up, be healthy! Many people write reviews here that either they paid for everyone, or the neolyn employees are scribbling comments. They write that there are no false ones, but hell! He loves to tryndet on cars with blind spot radars, long-range radios, refueling. And maybe in the signature mode he would have weeded out the signal, but if you turn on the signatures on the track, then wait for a letter of happiness. Turbo mode is a hysterical end yelling at everything and everyone on a long journey, immediately take a rope with soap, climb up. You can only drive along the track in route mode without signatures. In megacities, I would not cut it in either ...

Comment: From all that has been said, we can conclude that the device certainly copes, but the hysterics is over, so this device will go to those who have nerves of steel .... If it really worked well in signatures, it would not yell at everything and everyone, it could have a radius detection set, the device would be a masterpiece, but for now an honest four with a fat minus. And finally, I can say for sure that it is useless in Georgia and Turkey.

Advantages: updated immediately to the 14th firmware, set the settings, it works properly, at least false

Disadvantages: no better at the moment

Comment:

Advantages: it turns on quickly, does not freeze, the speaker has sufficient performance and does not rattle, the mount is simple, it is very easy to switch modes, it sees well, the power button on the charger is easily updated, it also sometimes reports about the strip control

Disadvantages: of the minuses ... I would like some kind of embossed plastic, textured, or rubberized coating ... personally, I still did not like the corrugated power cord, although if it were straight, I would have thought of a corrugated one, probably, I would like another wifi upgrade - right in the car, but the price would be higher.

Comment: I studied all devices with similar characteristics, then it is a fact that I took the best for this money ..

Advantages: Informative display, good sensitivity, range, ease of use and settings, quickly catches GPS.

Disadvantages: Although there is a z-filter, it still catches left signals from gas stations and from passing cars, probably with a blind spot monitoring system. Not all fixed cameras are in the database.

Comment: I bought it before going to our south, initially I wanted a silver stone f1 Monaco S, also a signature one. But the company manager advised Neoline 7500S, convinced by the manufacturer's quality and 2 years warranty. For a short time of driving around Moscow time, there were no questions, there were stationary cameras in the database, but on the m-4 highway not all fixed cameras were in the database, despite the fact that the database was updated from the manufacturer's website. I was driving along the highway in the 'track' mode, the detection range of the three-legged, decent, enough time to reset. But the left actuation is also boring, and on gas stations and on cars (?), And even figs understand what. Last year I traveled to Abkhazia, there was an ordinary cheap Chinese radar that sounded much more often in comparison. But the price of neoline is 7990 rubles. On the whole, I am satisfied with the device, I would like the base of stationary cameras to be updated in a better quality.

Advantages: - Range - Relevance of the filtering algorithm - Many settings

Disadvantages: - Piles on some cars - The difference in volume for different signals to different complexes

Comment: I bought this model instead of the technologically and morally obsolete Sho-Me G-700STR. Compared to Shomik, there are much fewer false positives on the highway, but some (but not any) cars such as Kodiaks or Mazda6 beep incessantly. I hope that filters for new models and systems of all these "assistants" will be added in the next firmware versions. On paid sections M4 r / d "saw" farms with the radar part even when they were not visible, about 2 kilometers away. The database of stationary cameras is quite complete, updated regularly, but the coordinates are not always accurate (the spread is + - 20 meters). On sections with average speed control, calculates and displays this average speed. The radar part reacts to lasers directly at the moment of passage under the farm, but as I understand it, all the r / d behave this way. There was a case that I lost satellites, a reset helped - once it happened in the gorge, the second - on the plain. I traveled around Moscow, but it is useless to use, since the cameras are 100 meters away almost everywhere, and I have already learned their location on the main routes - it's easier not to exceed them. But in unfamiliar cities it will be very useful. In general, I am rather satisfied with the purchase, I have not received any fines from the tracks yet.

Advantages: A strange device. In short - it catches everything, switches to the necessary modes by itself, there are very few false signals, it hits far, the speed with a full base. Although on the other hand, this is exactly what a device for almost 10 thousand should be. Therefore, I think it's worth its money - provided (as they say - young, that's ai min) that you really need it, it will pay off very quickly. You just need to remember that the maximum range and operation of the EXD module is only in the Highway mode, it is disabled in the City.

Disadvantages: I am very surprised that there is no rug on the dashboard. Yes, most often people hang them on the glass under the ceiling, but I have a registrar there, I had to clutter up my windshield. The screen is monochrome - for that kind of money, I think I have the right to claim color TFT.

Comment: A radar detector that really works. There is nothing more to say.

Advantages: Perfectly catches any radar.

Disadvantages: Fastened to glass, not tidy.

Comment: I can't say anything special. The radar is working, with a minimum of errors, with a clear interface. Everything is fine.

Advantages: Very compact Long oscil distance Cuts off blind spot sensors Bright screen

Disadvantages: No mat on the dash

Comment: I took it after reading a comparative test for "driving". Reg showed the greatest detection distance, which is what I need of him. With a speedcam, it's understandable that top manufacturers have it already good for everyone. But catching low-impulse Oskonovs is a straightforward trouble. Moreover, in the region, there are actually 3-4 lorries with them, and simple radar detectors (specially taken from a friend), at best, signal about 50 meters away. In short, the 7500 works without question, it beeps steadily for half a kilometer. It's strange that they didn't put a rug on the dashboard, I have to hang it on the glass, I'm so uncomfortable. By the way, unfortunate surveyors say they say this is a signature with camera signatures. Delirium - here are the signatures of sensors such as sensors of dead zones, i.e. so that there are fewer false positives. And at the same time, unlike conventional signatures, it did not block real cameras.

Relatively large screen for a classic radar detector. I don't look at the speedometer at all now. For a couple of months with the neoline 7500s, I trained myself to listen to the detector readings. He knows how to read the speed and checks the map with the maximum allowed. Well, it warns of exceeding. The detector is good, and the distance from which it detects radars (and it is huge, thanks to the long-range radar module) is usually sufficient. And there are practically no mistakes in the definition of complexes.