Panasonic EW-DJ10

Advantages: Reliable

Disadvantages: Serves only 5 years

Comment: I have been using it for over 5 years. I use rechargeable batteries instead of batteries. One charge is enough for about 2 weeks (I use it once a day). After 5 years, the power dropped, water began to leak into the battery compartment, the spring and the switch contacts were rusted (I already found this out after disassembly). In general, I gave up the idea to fix it - I decided to buy a new one. And, it turned out, not in vain. Since the new one works 2 times more powerful. Apparently, in the old one, the mechanisms have worn out and the tightness of the piston to the cylinder has decreased. If this one also works for 5 years, then I will buy the same one again.

Advantages: price, light weight, convenient to fill in water, conveniently folds and unfolds, looks nice, replaceable finger batteries instead of a battery (it will probably last longer)

Disadvantages: less convenient to direct a stream of water in comparison with a conventional irrigator (not portable); in my case, the battery cover does not unscrew well; only two modes for a jet pressure + not a constant pressure a bit

Comment: I have been using it for a couple of weeks, it is quite working, convenient and successful model; recommend

Advantages: 1. The main advantage is compactness. The device retracts halfway into its own water tank, there is a niche for the tip on the body. 2. The jet pressure is quite decent. 3. Battery Powered - A spare set of two batteries can be purchased anywhere and changing batteries (as opposed to charging batteries) is quick. Summary: for business trips and travel - out of competition.

Disadvantages: It will be clear in six months or a year. There is no spare tip, they are sold in 2 pieces for more than 600 rubles. for a couple (2017). You need to take a spare on a business trip, because if the main one falls, it can break.

Comment: 1. Unscrew the cover of the battery compartment with the edge of the coin, without jerking and super-efforts, the first time it can be difficult to open. 2. I believe it should be stored correctly in the extended state (ready for use) - in case of rare business trips in the folded state, the supply tube in the container may theoretically be deformed. 3. When separating the water tank from the body of the irrigator, be careful not to accidentally rip off the valve on the tank - the plastic tabs-axis of the valve are not designed for heavy loads. 4. I believe that all wireless devices are for travelers only. At home, it will be correct to use stationary devices, since both the jet pressure is higher and the water tank does not need to be recharged 4 times. At the same time, the compact device serves as a backup device in case of a stationary failure.

Advantages: Compact (for storage) Powered by two AA batteries Price Assembled with high quality in appearance

Disadvantages: Weak pressure (according to the sensations, the pressure of the jet does not reach the declared ones), which is why not all types of contaminants can be removed Bulky when used Small reservoir capacity (you have to fill it several times for a full cycle) Nozzle of the same type, you cannot find braces

Comment: I needed an irrigator on a battery so that I could take it with me (to work, on vacation, etc.), there was already a stationary one for the house at that time, there is something to compare with. The choice fell on this model for the following reasons: low price, compact and rather powerful (on paper), moreover, it runs on batteries. The folded irrigator (the container with the water can be folded for storage) is quite compact, you can put it in a bag and because of the design you will not have to be afraid that something will happen to it. Battery operation is more expensive, but for the "tourist" version it is very convenient, you just need to have a couple of batteries in stock. But in terms of power, the irrigator did not justify. I have a stationary irrigator with a comparable declared power and a slightly higher pulsation frequency), this one feels a lot worse. As a mobile option, the irrigator is not bad. But it is much less convenient than the "home" option. Firstly, when unfolded, it becomes very bulky (without a spout, the body itself is under 30 cm), moreover, due to the fact that the tank is on the body, it is necessary to hold the irrigator almost strictly vertically (especially when it becomes 20 % or less) The tank is not large, it turns out to be poured at least twice for cleaning. Secondly, the irrigator clearly lacks the capacity to cope with all types of pollution. As a result, in order to properly clean the oral cavity, you have to spend much more time than using a stationary, "home" irrigator. As the only irrigator, this model will definitely not fit. But as a tourist option, it can be considered. For this price, it is quite good, at the time of selection (March 2017) it was the cheapest of the irrigators with normal characteristics (suitable for my requirements).

Advantages: There is no hassle with charging the battery, because. the device is powered by finger batteries.

Disadvantages: The water tank is enough for one jaw treatment, so for a complete oral cavity treatment you need to fill the tank 2 times.

Comment:

Advantages: super if traveling. The reservoir is just right if you don't have a big mouth)))

Disadvantages: fig unscrew the cover for the batteries. It is necessary to pry with a ruble and turn it all the way

Comment: Nice purchase. No need to look for an outlet.

Advantages: Sufficient jet head, inexpensive.

Disadvantages: An incorrect description on the Market spoiled the impression of the purchase. The main parameter by which I was looking for two nozzles. The description indicates two, in fact one. It also seems to be written that it runs on a battery, in fact on batteries, and they will run out at the most inopportune moment. And in the photo it looks compact, as it was photographed in profile, in reality it is wide and rather bulky.

Comment: Overall not a bad model, but personally I was looking for another.

Advantages: Compact, good pressure, copes with its task.

Disadvantages: Brittle plastic of the nozzle.

Comment: The attachment broke when dropped.

Advantages: Compactness

Disadvantages: not found

Comment: Conveniently, the device is battery-powered and compact.

Advantages: Convenient to carry. Sufficient water volume. Works on rechargeable batteries. A sufficient number of speeds.

Disadvantages: It cannot be rinsed inside in any way if, for some reason, a plaque has formed.

Comment: This dj-10 Irrigator is the first in my life, so the opinion may be too subjective. After installing braces, I purchased this (as it seems to me now) irreplaceable thing. The batteries lasted for a long time, despite this, I inserted finger batteries. The gums were bleeding at first. For me, the first speed is enough, the second already seems too powerful. The water added to the irrigator, for me personally, is enough to clean the entire interdental space. An irrigator, in my opinion, is by no means a substitute for a toothbrush and toothpaste. I travel a lot, so I take it with me. In short, it has become a useful device in my life. I definitely recommend it!