WaterPik WP-450 Cordless Plus
Short review
Selected in the rating
16
Best rating
irrigators
Power supply: battery powered - Jet control - Type: pulse
Buy WaterPik WP-450 Cordless Plus
Features WaterPik WP-450 Cordless Plus
Yandex.Market data
| General characteristics | |
| A type | irrigator |
| Principle of operation | impulse |
| Food | from battery |
| Tank capacity | 210 ml |
| Jet pressure | 217 - 520 kPa |
| Jet pressure adjustment | stepped |
| Modes | jets |
| Number of modes / adjustments | 2 |
| Battery type | own |
| Spray time | 45 sec. |
| Water pulsation frequency | 1450 impulses / min |
| Equipment | |
| Nozzles | for cleaning the tongue, jet, orthodontic (for braces), attachment for cleaning implants and crowns, total number of irrigator attachments: 4 |
| Rotation of the nozzle 360 degrees | there is |
| Handle switch | there is |
| Features: | |
| Battery type | own |
| Dimensions (WxDxH) | 7x10x21 cm |
| Additional Information | battery charge lasts for 5-7 days |
Opinions about WaterPik WP-450 Cordless Plus
Yandex.Market data
Advantages:
I carry it with me, I use it after each meal very conveniently, that there is no dependence on the power supply. Charging is enough for a long time. After the purchase, I waited for a complete discharge and charged overnight and half a day. It took almost 3 weeks. Effectively flushes out food debris. I use one nozzle. After use, I wipe it with a dry microfiber cloth, especially the place of contacts for charging. Convenient to hold, the shape is placed under the arm.
Disadvantages:
Not enough carrying case. A strong jet can knock out the cement from under the crown, more accurately. The contacts are not protected from water. High price.
Comment:
In general, I'm happy with the purchase. Where brush and toothpicks are not available, the Waterpik WP-450 irrigator does a great job. I got it for the care of braces.
4 September 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Powerful, did not expect this from a rechargeable device, a tenacious battery.
Disadvantages:
There is no case, you have to carry it in the factory box so as not to damage the attachments.
Comment:
September 23, 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Convenient to use, good pressure, the nozzle rotates around its axis
Disadvantages:
Price
Comment:
I have been using this model for 3 years. Good head, several different attachments. On sale there are replaceable nozzles of the same company (bought several times). This is very convenient as it is recommended to change the nozzle every 6 months. The charge lasts for a week. There are certain difficulties with the care of the irrigator. Over time, plaque accumulates inside the reservoir, which is difficult to remove and clean. You have to spend a lot of time and effort to get rid of it. For the rest, there are no complaints.
October 20, 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Lightweight, comfortable enough in the hand. Several attachments included. Not "crystal" - withstood a dozen falls into the bath (from a height of 50-70cm).
Disadvantages:
There is no charging indicator - you can only check if it is charged by experience. With discharge the same thing - I determine by reducing the pressure.
Comment:
I have been using it for a little over a year. there is nothing to compare.The reservoir is really small - you need 2 fillings for cleaning, but in my opinion this is not a drawback - it will be inconvenient to hold with a larger one (and maybe hard). In general, it is a normal option for a small bathroom (or one in which a stationary hemorrhoid should be placed) and trips with something larger than a handbag.
October 20, 2016, Domodedovo
Advantages:
Powerful, multiple attachments
Disadvantages:
The battery only lasted for 2 years
Comment:
I use it twice a day, both at home and on trips. Charging is enough for about a week, charges overnight. I really like that there are several attachments and a spoon for cleaning the tongue. However, the battery lasted only for 2 years, I did not know that if the receipt was preserved and the period was less than 2 years from the date of purchase, then it was changed for free for a new one. Now they brought exactly the same from America, I'll see how long its battery will last.
May 25, 2017, Cherepovets
Advantages:
Compact, really clean.
Disadvantages:
there is no battery charging indicator on the case.
Comment:
After installing the implant, on the advice of the dentist, I purchased an irrigator. I chose among several similar models. The Waterpeak 450 bribed with its compactness, ergonomic body, 4 nozzles in the complete set, ease of use. Charging is enough for a week (I use 3-5 times a week). The first use is washed. all the walls in the bathroom, but not the teeth. But the second time, everything is in order, the reservoir of 210 ml is enough for the procedure. Instructions for the device are written in a simple and understandable manner, supplied with pictures. This small irrigator fits perfectly into the design of a tiny bathroom. I use it with pleasure.
14 February 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
Fully meets the declared characteristics
Disadvantages:
Price; no way to replace the battery
Comment:
I have been using this model for a little over 2 years. I have no complaints about him. The charge, as indicated, is enough for 5-7 days, cleans well, nothing cracked, as they say in the reviews about the WP-100 Ultra model. The only negative - a couple of months ago, it started charging only on the second attempt. Apparently, it's time to buy a new one. only the battery cannot be replaced.
January 12, 2016, Moscow
Advantages:
Works and really cleans. When I was once again going to remove stones, they said that I did not have them.
Disadvantages:
There is no charging indicator, you really don't know when to charge. Past generation battery.
Comment:
One reservoir is enough for me for the entire oral cavity, I use it in the morning and in the evening. Only the battery is upsetting, it would be modern and remove open contacts.
December 14, 2016, Moscow
Advantages:
Compact. It is convenient to take on a trip and takes up little space on the shelf in the bathroom.
Disadvantages:
I read before buying about flooding the charging pins. Why don't manufacturers figure out how to make a rubber plug. I try to twirl the irrigator in my hands so that I do not pour water during operation, but so far it turns out badly.
Comment:
Weak pressure. At the dacha I have an irrigator of the same company but with a bowl for water. Has been working for over 4 years. This is where the pressure of the jet is very powerful. And here I was a little upset.
September 7, 2017, Moscow
Advantages:
An excellent device, it keeps charging for a long time. Has a good package. I like the compactness.
Disadvantages:
Few modes, but there are enough of them.
Comment:
11 May 2018, Moscow
