Neoline G-Tech X53

Short review
Neoline G-Tech X53
Selected in the rating
19
Best rating DVRs
Mid-price - With portable cameras - Automotive - With a good camera
Back to rating
Share

Buy Neoline G-Tech X53

Neoline G-Tech X53 specifications

Yandex.Market data
Main characteristics
DVR design with external cameras, without screen
Number of cameras 2
Number of video / audio recording channels 2/1
Video recording 1920 × 1080 @ 30 fps
Recording mode cyclical
Functions shock sensor (G-sensor), GPS, GLONASS, motion detector in the frame
Recording time and date, speed
Sound built-in speaker
Connecting external cameras there is
Camera
Viewing angle 130 ° (diagonal)
Video recording
Video duration 1 min, 2 min, 3 min
Write protection there is
Event recording to a separate file yes, before the event 8 seconds, after the event 10 seconds
Modes auto start recording, file recording after power off
Recording format MP4
Food
Food from the vehicle electrical system
Connection
Wireless connection Wi-Fi
Data storage
Memory card support microSD (microSDHC) up to 64 GB
Formatting the memory card there is
Additionally
Working temperature -10 - +70 ° C
Storage temperature -30 - +80 ° C
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) 111x21x69 mm
Weight 100 g
Additional Information parking mode

Reviews about Neoline G-Tech X53

Yandex.Market data
Rating: 5 out of 5
Dmitry K.
Advantages: Good quality of shooting, viewing angles, configuration of modules (diversity of GPS, microphone, central processing and storage module, buttons for emergency data storage). The cameras are invisible, the microphone is located closer to the traffic policeman in case of anything, and in order to steal a microSD card from the car, you need to know where to look and poke around for a long time.
Disadvantages: I would recommend developers to add a device reset button to some understandable place. Hang such functionality on the base of the wire hooked to OBDII or on the emergency data recording button. Once, after I was poking around with the device for half an hour through the program, there was such a glitch on the phone that the phone seemed to have disconnected from the device, and the device still thought that the connection to it was active and did not record. Over the next night in the parking lot, it went away on its own, but all the hardware is this - the reset button will not hurt anyone :) Other shortcomings for almost a month have not been identified.
Comment: A lot of comments on this and other registrars on the market raise a lot of questions. Some technical characteristics and glitches of which the described devices actually do not have are mentioned. About this registrar, for example, they write something about data on radars - this is complete nonsense. About many people write that the menu there is some kind of crooked, the Chinese version of the Russian language and the programmers are mentally retarded ... Very strange. And personal experience and reviews on YouTube and specialized media suggest that these are either custom-made reviews, or people bought Chinese fakes and complain that they say they do not work well. In general, my X53 fully complies with the declared characteristics and reviews on YouTube, of which I found a lot. The price-quality ratio is generally very attractive: the model is closer to the top segment, the cost is from the middle segment, but at the same time the set includes a flash drive and battery protection from overdischarge, which seem to reduce the cost of the video recorder itself by a couple of thousand rubles, and in this context it turns out to be very, very profitable. At the time when I bought it, it cost an average of 14-16tr, due to the flash drive and protection it seemed to fit into the budget of 12-14tr, and competed with models costing from 20tr. Well, in terms of design, there is an impression that this device is indestructible: there is no dependence on temperature changes (there is no lithium battery, there is nothing to die), all components are made solidly and soundly, 3M adhesive tape holds like a stone, etc. The ride became a little quieter. Anything can happen on the road, and there is at least some kind of protection against illegal actions.
13 March 2019, Pushchino
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: 1) Two cameras. 2) Expansion microphone and panic button that saves files "on demand". 3) Shooting both night and day is excellent. And the rear camera is not for a jackdaw, but a normal one too. Even if the resolution is slightly less than that of the main one. 4) "Speedcam" radar warning system. 5) Convenient wi-fi connection to the phone and, accordingly, the application on the phone. 6) Price (I think it is quite humane).
Disadvantages: Only that it’s impossible to connect and lay all the wires yourself. You have to do this in the SC for a fee.
Comment:
5 March 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: 2 cameras, very good quality of shooting, availability of coordinates, GPS \ Glonass What I especially liked is the convenient setting of work parameters. Configurable shock sensor sensitivity. 4 folders are created in the recorder: Drive - the files of video recordings are added here Event - the recorder adds records here, when the sensor is triggered, for example, when adjusting the sensitivity - when the speed bumps pass - the record will be stored here, or you can turn off the sensitivity, and the record in this folder will the onset of an event, such as a strong impact (accident) Motion - the parking mode files are stored here. The advantage is the ability to form records by impact, or by movement in the camera. Protection - you can save records by pressing the button. Very comfortably. They are not erased. The presence of viewing cameras in real time on the smartphone screen, and viewing recordings there. Another advantage is the presence of a sound notification about its actions, it is inappropriate to look at light bulbs, etc., the recorder itself says in what mode it works. The microphone is not dry, the sound is clear. The registrar itself is very thought out, I really liked it.
Disadvantages: After numerous experiments with memory cards, we can conclude - when installing a 10 class memory card. type U1 (U3) - braking is about 2 times the playback of files on the iphone screen. It only slows down viewing files with a 64 GB flash drive. The recordings themselves on the PC screen from the USB stick do not slow down Everything works very well. This is 1 jamb. 2 cant - there is a video player on the neoline website, but it does not work for this model. Doesn't want to play files.
Comment: I liked the video recorder very much, well thought-out engineering solutions that will allow you to save important records in manual or automatic mode, I hope the jambs will be cured with software. Recommended to friends and acquaintances. If you have forgotten the password for wi-fi-, there is a file on the Memory Card, opening which with a text editor you will see your password.
December 21, 2018, Ulyanovsk
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: A good dual-camera recorder with high bitrate shooting, cool image detail and all sorts of cool tricks like Wi-Fi and a panic button.
Disadvantages: no
Comment: How many custom-made nonsense were written here) Obviously, the model was not even in my hands, but the money is money)) I'll just go through the points: "the quality of shooting during the day (and in the dark) is much worse than that of other regs, which is half the price ; " - no regs twice cheaper will give such a picture "the video is interrupted when creating a new file, i.e. roughly speaking for every 3-5 minutes of video - 20 seconds of shooting is lost, on other regs this was not (I experimented with different settings - not helped); " - outright lies. the video is written overlaid on the previous frame, so there is no loss at all. "The double-sided tape on the microphone is constantly peeling off, apparently, the most deshman one is used." here no comment. double-sided tape comes off only if it has been used several times before. "It drains the car battery from 100% charge up to 12 V (25%) per day! Consumption of 420-450 mA in parking mode! This is a lot! That is, in fact, it does not perform the function due to which it was installed!" - also a lie ... Yandex, be careful and do not miss outright orders.
October 25, 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: times - diminutiveness and invisibility. taking into account which country we live in, the registrar should be as inconspicuous as possible (unless you take it off every night). I don’t take pictures and I really like that it is practically invisible from the outside if you don’t know where to look. two is a good video. this is no longer news, many recorders have learned to shoot well, but given the kit, positioning and price, one would expect the quality to be worse. however, everything is fine here - the Sony matrix is ​​quite large, and the processor is fast, it manages to process video from both cameras. three - equipment. the set is huge, from a memory card to cable ties. of curious pieces - the sos button. it hasn’t come in handy for me yet, but what it is for is clear and obvious.
Disadvantages: I had to pay extra for the installation, because that is a rather difficult action. external microphone. Okay, a camera or a gps module, or even here is the "SOS" button, but why make a microphone external. extra wires, IMHO.
Comment: the registrar on a 10-point scale can safely and honestly rate at 9. and even then, only because the ideal does not exist, I think.
1 March 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Advantages: Both cameras shoot well, the parking mode is implemented very conveniently, the GPS module shows radars (I did not write it quite correctly, but in general the speed records were not just "anyhow", but really working).
Disadvantages: Too many wires. And on both cameras, and on the microphone module, and on the GPS ... Tired of placing. If they did it all via wi-fi (or at least cameras), it would be gorgeous!
Comment: I highly recommend all future buyers not to register themselves, but to do it in the service. A lot of nerves were spent on a competent installation. Better pay money.
March 29, 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Lada P.
Advantages: Premium video recorder. That says it all. A clear picture, clear sound, the possibility of convenient location of the recorder components in the car interior.
Comment: What I liked is that the whole box with the connected wires is hidden under the casing. Only two miniature cameras, a microphone and an “alarm” (as I call it) button enter the salon. No extra wires. Minimalism in action)) All components can be placed freely anywhere in the car. Well, more about the panic button. This, in my opinion, is one of the main features of the model. In my service they fixed it near the steering wheel. If, mmm, accident or something like that, you can quickly click on this button to protect the current video file from being overwritten. Very comfortably. No need to search on the registrar itself which button is responsible for this.
April 12, 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Alexander I.
Advantages: Convenience of location in the car. Stealth. Two independent cameras. Cameras record equally well. Convenience of settings. The ability to enable the watchdog function. Automatic (upon impact or shake) or forced (from the button) saving of the required video segment.
Disadvantages: There are no video resolution settings, because of this, there is not enough memory to save all the necessary events. There is no automatic transfer of video to cloud storage.
Comment: I took a registrar, focusing primarily on the possibility of hidden installation and the function of a video guard. Both cameras have very high quality matrices, they shoot at high resolution, the viewing angle is also good enough. But even the maximum memory capacity of a flash card (64 Gb) is not enough to maintain a long path of movement, for example, when on the road for two or three days. A wi-fi connection with a phone is more like an add-on.convenience for initial settings, the functionality of the application is not enough, developers could expand it, especially since android nowadays allows you to write any program. Neither the DVR software nor the Android application has been updated since the installation. The bottom line of all of the above is that applications are still in the lead in terms of functionality - auto registrars from the Play market (good ones are paid in most cases) installed on a more or less productive smartphone with a good camera, the only thing they are inferior in is that simultaneous rearview recording do not lead without additional devices. Although, modern car GUs on android have been coping with this for a long time. So this DVR can be estimated as something between suction cups and multifunctional GUs on android.
October 24, 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Arkady Gavrilov
I chose the DVR for a long time, looked at the reviews, this model attracted right away, in the end I was not mistaken with the choice. I have been using it for about two months. There were no problems. The camera can be installed inconspicuously, it is convenient that there is a Wi-Fi connection, high quality for both day and night shooting. There is also an external microphone. The installation is slightly different from other DVRs. The design is simple, no frills, I like it. Another big plus is the non-removable power cable for the rear camera. This is by far the best model I have come across.
June 2, 2018, Moscow
Rating: 5 out of 5
Oleg Viktorovich I.
Has been working for over a year. Everything is stable
2 September 2019

Electronics

Office

Appliances